🔗 Share this article

Among the most recognizable pictures of modern history depicts a naked girl, her hands extended, her face twisted in pain, her skin burned and raw. She appears running towards the photographer after escaping a bombing within the Vietnam War. To her side, additional kids are fleeing out of the destroyed community in the area, against a background featuring black clouds and soldiers.

This International Effect from a Seminal Picture

Within hours its release during the Vietnam War, this image—officially called "The Terror of War"—became a traditional phenomenon. Witnessed and debated by countless people, it's broadly attributed for motivating global sentiment opposing the US war in Vietnam. An influential critic afterwards observed how the profoundly indelible image of the child Kim Phúc suffering likely did more to increase global outrage regarding the hostilities compared to lengthy broadcasts of shown violence. A renowned British photojournalist who covered the fighting labeled it the single best photograph from what became known as the televised conflict. A different seasoned photojournalist declared that the image represents quite simply, one of the most important photographs ever taken, specifically from that conflict.

The Long-Standing Claim Followed by a New Claim

For half a century, the photo was assigned to Nick Út, a then-21-year-old local photojournalist on assignment for the Associated Press during the war. Yet a controversial new documentary released by a popular platform argues which states the well-known photograph—widely regarded as the apex of combat photography—was actually shot by a different man on the scene during the attack.

According to the film, The Terror of War was actually captured by an independent photographer, who sold his photos to the AP. The allegation, and the film’s resulting investigation, originates with a former editor a former photo editor, who claims that a influential bureau head instructed him to reassign the photograph's attribution from the original photographer to Út, the one employed photographer on site at the time.

This Search to find Answers

The source, now in his 80s, reached out to a filmmaker a few years ago, requesting help in finding the unknown cameraman. He stated that, if he could be found, he wished to extend an apology. The filmmaker reflected on the freelance photojournalists he knew—seeing them as current independents, similar to Vietnamese freelancers at the time, are often ignored. Their contributions is frequently doubted, and they operate amid more challenging circumstances. They have no safety net, no long-term security, little backing, they usually are without adequate tools, making them highly exposed when documenting in their own communities.

The investigator pondered: “What must it feel like to be the individual who made this image, if indeed it wasn't Nick Út?” From a photographic perspective, he thought, it would be extraordinarily painful. As a student of war photography, especially the vaunted combat images of the era, it could prove earth-shattering, possibly legacy-altering. The respected heritage of "Napalm Girl" within the community meant that the director whose parents emigrated in that period was hesitant to take on the project. He stated, I hesitated to challenge the accepted account that credited Nick the photograph. I also feared to disrupt the status quo within a population that always admired this accomplishment.”

The Inquiry Unfolds

But the two the journalist and his collaborator concluded: it was important asking the question. As members of the press are to hold everybody else accountable,” said one, “we have to be able to address tough issues of ourselves.”

The investigation documents the journalists while conducting their research, from eyewitness interviews, to requests in today's Ho Chi Minh City, to archival research from other footage recorded at the time. Their work eventually yield a name: a freelancer, a driver for a news network at the time who also provided images to the press on a freelance basis. According to the documentary, a moved the man, now also elderly and living in the United States, states that he sold the photograph to the agency for $20 with a physical photo, but was plagued by the lack of credit for years.

The Backlash and Ongoing Scrutiny

He is portrayed throughout the documentary, quiet and thoughtful, but his story became explosive among the community of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to